[Full text] Song Ha Yoon's side: ”There was no forced transfer... There is no doubt that A, who spread rumors of school violence, was wanted.”

Actor Song Ha Yoon's side refuted A's statement that he was the one who spread the allegations of school violence, and once again clarified the process of the legal action related to the issue in a stage-like manner.

　On the 5th, Song Ha Yoon's legal representative, Ji-eum, stated, “A claims that he has been notified and is not under arrest, but our legal representative clearly confirmed the notification and clarified his position,” adding, "As a result of inquiries by the investigative agency regarding Mr. A's rebuttal, the investigative agency in charge has stated that they do not understand Mr. A's position. As a result, on July 3rd, 2025, we contacted Mr. A again and informed him that 'it is correct that he has been placed on the wanted list, that the police will be notified when he enters the country, that he must appear before the police, and that if he does not respond to the investigation despite his entry, an arrest warrant may be issued for him. Mr. A responded that he had again communicated the contents of the report to the police.

　Last April, through JTBC's “Case Squad Leader,” Mr. A provided information that he had been bullied by Song Ha Yoon20 years ago. At the time, Song Ha Yoon, through his agency, refuted that all the relevant details were not true.

　However, Song Ha Yoon's side later clarified its position that it had filed a criminal complaint against Mr. A for the first time in a year after the allegations were made, but Mr. A responded by stating that the two schools that Song Ha Yoon attended belonged to the same school district and that it was impossible to transfer to another school simply by changing school districts, and that it would consider responding to the allegations without changing its stance. There are some indications that they would like to do so.

0 Full text of the position of Song Ha Yoon's legal representative

Good afternoon. My name is Gium, the legal representative of actor Song Ha Yoon.

We have recently informed actor Song Ha Yoon's representative of the legal actions taken in relation to the issue of school violence.

In response, A, the initial disseminator, remained in the U.S. and again disseminated false facts through social networking sites and media interviews on July 2, 2025, to which we take the position that he should be held accountable.

A claims that he has been placed under a Notice of Appointment and is not wanted, but our legal firm has clearly reviewed the Notice and clarified our position. The investigative agency contacted Mr. A again on July 3, 2025, and received a response stating that it had again communicated to him that he was correct that he had been placed on the wanted list, that the police would be notified when he entered the country, that he would be obliged to appear, and that in the event that he entered the country and did not respond to the investigation, an arrest warrant might be issued for his arrest.

In addition, the investigative authorities repeatedly informed Mr. A that he could not be investigated in writing and that he would have to enter Korea to be investigated, and at the same time informed him that if he did not comply, he might be placed under arrest warrant, but he repeated his position that he would not enter Korea. In response, the police eventually determined that he had no intention of cooperating with the investigation, and placed him on the “wanted persons” list of the police computer network. Actor Song Ha Yoon clarified that he never assaulted A, and that he submitted numerous objective evidences, including his life record book, to the investigative authorities, and that he was not subjected to a mandatory transfer punishment.

A argues to the effect that he is not obligated to appear before the investigative agency in Korea to respond to the investigation because he is a U.S. citizen, but regardless of whether or not he holds U.S. citizenship, he is obligated to respond to the investigation by the Korean investigative agency if he holds the citizenship of the Republic of Korea.

He denies even the objectively obvious facts, only to take advantage of the fact that he can stay in the U.S. and avoid the investigation, and persist in his