[Full text] "former APRIL" Lee Hyun-joo announces a statement at the bullying affair ... "The" APRIL "member has been accused of defamation."

Girl group "APRIL" former member Lee Hyun-joo has added a position on discussions with "APRIL" members.

Lee Hyun-joo told Instagram on the 15th, "Before the criminal case is over, it's not a happy story for me or everyone who listens, and it's not something that can be resolved immediately by telling me now. I try not to mention it as much as possible, but many people are frustrated with the current situation and have sent words asking them to share the situation, and I am worried that I will post such a post. "

At the same time, he said, "First of all, in the criminal case in which I, my family, and acquaintances were accused, I will submit the maximum amount of materials I can find and respond to it." Even after raising it, I have been charged with additional charges, and the number of cases has increased a little. "

▲ The following is the full text of Lee Hyun Joo's position statement

Hello, this is Lee Hyun Joo
I'm not happy with myself or everyone who listens to it, and it's not something I can solve right away, so I try not to mention it before the criminal case is over. However, many people are frustrated with the current situation and have sent words asking them to share the situation, and I am worried that I will post such a post.

First of all, I would like to tell you about the current situation. In criminal cases in which I, my family, and acquaintances have been accused, I will submit and respond to the maximum amount of materials I can find. Even after I raised my position statement, I was still charged with additional charges, and the number of cases increased a little.
To briefly explain the progress of the case,

The younger brother was decided not to be sent in the case of defamation charges, but the complainant is dissatisfied and the prosecution is proceeding with the dissatisfaction procedure.

Friend 1 was dismissed in the defamation case and was dissatisfied by the complainant, but the prosecution also finally received the non-delivery decision.

Friend 2 has been investigated by the police in a defamation case and is waiting for a decision.

I was additionally charged by DSP for obstruction of business, investigated by the police, and decided not to be sent.

"APRIL" member A has filed an additional complaint against me for defamation through legal entity B and is in the process of investigation.

"APRIL" member C has also filed an additional complaint against me for defamation through legal entity D and is in the process of investigation.

It is true that there are still too many incidents, the costs are considerable, and the power is strong. I am sincerely responding to the survey, and I will take more resolute action so that I can inform you of good results as many people support me.
In addition to this, I would like to mention the part that many people requested to explain.

In connection with the face-to-face investigation, I have never refused the face-to-face investigation, and I have never been asked to do the face-to-face investigation in connection with the case of refusal. ..

I'm sorry about the medical records, but there is a part that is too sensitive for me to publish the material publicly, and I do not want to make it publicly stimulating. I would like to ask you to understand this part again, and I have submitted all of it to the investigative agency, so if you wait for the investigation result, I will inform you of the result again.

The message of condemnation of the parents of the "APRIL" member is not directly related to the accusations of me, my brother or a friend and has not been submitted to the investigative agency. It is true that I and my family were deeply hurt when I received the message, but looking back, from the standpoint of the members' parents, I think they may be able to send their thoughts in the message. So I will not take the initiative to publish it, and I will publish it if all "APRIL" members request it, but I am wondering if it is necessary and I am worried.

Grandma was in very poor health at the time of the tumbler incident and is now dead. At that time, I didn't recognize me well, but when I heard that I had to live in a dormitory and couldn't come all the time, I received the tumbler I had, which is important to me. So it was a tumbler that I always carried with me.

The younger brother's decision not to prosecute was made public with the evidence and cited cases removed. The lawyer's idea is that if you don't know who the complainant is and the breakdown of the evidence is published, you can preview the details of the evidence and it will be disadvantageous to me if anyone is considering additional accusations. If there is, the police admitted the bullying and released the decision to show that the press release on the DSP side is different from the fact, but for those who are not accustomed to the format of the decision of the investigative agency He also said that the breakdown of evidence and the case law cited could provide a distance for another discussion. And since the plaintiff can also check the non-indictment decision, if the plaintiff decides that it is necessary, the full text can be published at any time, and in this process it is possible to confirm who the plaintiff is. It seems that the point was also taken into consideration.

It's been a long time, but it's still a lot of work for me to make a public statement. Even so, thanks to the people who think about me, I have been able to come this far, and I think I will be able to deal with it in the future. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to those who believe and support us. Time has passed and it's autumn. I hope the incident will end soon and I can say hello to you with a happier story.