[Full text] "Power harassment exposure" stylist, "Apologie directly from IRENE. No financial agreement"

IRENE "Red Velvet", was involved in "power harassment suspicion" and apologized for it, while stylist A who raised the suspicion stopped accusations that there was no financial agreement. Requested that you do it.

On the 23rd, Mr. A called IRENE "Mr. C" on SNS account and said, "It is rational every moment to prepare for this situation that I did not withdraw any action after posting the post at the beginning. And had to make wise decisions". "The biggest reason was that I didn't want to make a bigger misunderstanding and empower the rampant speculation and brawl"

In addition, "Immediately after that happened, the people involved in Company B who hired me and the managers at the scene acknowledged her mistake and received an apology, so there is a reason to act poorly. I thought it wasn't. "Along with this, the editor and assistant who worked with Mr. A accompanied him and reported that he met IRENE and received a direct apology.

A said, "The reason why I haven't taken any action so far is that from the time I thought that this should be corrected for the first time, the fundamental goal and purpose of my will was from her. I will receive a promise that I will not act like this," and "I will meet in person and receive an apology" from me and my two teams who received that day, "because they were these two." Yesterday I received an official apology and stopped everything because I achieved my goal."

In addition, said, "There is no such thing as a monetary agreement in the story that was created by imagining a part of it." Regarding the reason for receiving the apology, "Professional mission for what was requested." For me and my colleagues who have had the same experience so far, I will act to recover from personality blasphemy and protect the dignity I have left."

Finally, A said, "If you are a fan, I want you to stay without crossing any more lines." "Such sentences do not hurt me in any way or have a positive effect on her in any way." In addition, warned that they were preparing to deal with the promotion of hoaxes.

Mr. A, a stylist and fashion editor, claimed on the 20th that he had received power harassment from a celebrity on his SNS account. Later, it was argued that the entertainer in the text was IRENE of "Red Velvet". A, tagged the song "PSYcho" of "Red Velvet" and "monster" of IRENE & Seulgi in the disclosure statement, as well as deleted the post that praised IRENE posted in the past.

After that, it became clear that the entertainer was actually IRENE, and IRENE met A, admitted her mistake and apologized directly. IRENE's management company SM Entertainment promised to prevent recurrence with an apology. A also deleted the statement related to IRENE.

Below is the full text posted on SNS by stylist A.

This scar I have already received will never be forgotten. However, I wanted to receive an apology directly from C in order to protect my dignity as a human being, so I met C with the people in charge of Company B. It took a few adjustments and time to set up yesterday's venue.

The reason I didn't withdraw any action after posting the post first was that I had to make rational and wise decisions every moment to prepare for this situation. The biggest reason is that I didn't want to create a bigger misunderstanding and I didn't want to empower the rampant speculation and brawl.

Immediately after that happened, the people involved in Company B who hired me and the managers at the scene acknowledged her mistakes and received an apology, so I thought there was no reason to act badly.

I have never been a stylist for the group to which C belongs, and I was asked to "outsource" the shooting schedule 1Day styling on Tuesday, October 20th. (The first request for this schedule was on October 5th, and after receiving an email with official content on October 6th, 15 days at the request of the group to which Company B and C belong. Prepared for work)

I chose "the first person I met" because I didn't remember that C was shooting a magazine with me that day (I confirmed it when I met him yesterday). The action in question wasn't just me, but the same thing happened to one junior and one assistant of the other editors who helped me with my schedule that day.

For that reason, two people accompanied me to the apology seat yesterday, talked with the person in charge of company B and C, and each received an apology from C.

From the beginning, I thought that it was not necessary to deal with the ill-advised malicious writing of C's fans. The idea is still the same. The reason I haven't taken any action so far is that from the first time I thought I should correct this, the fundamental goal and purpose of my will was that she said, "I will do that to anyone in the future. It was because they were "to receive a promise to not take action" and "to meet in person and receive an apology" from me and my two team members who received that day. I achieved my goal, so I got an official apology yesterday and stopped everything.

There's nothing like a monetary agreement in some of the imaginative stories (just the payments and expenses that fit the 1DAY schedule I worked on October 20th). I still have), and I didn't even get the word "agreement" at yesterday's seat. It was not a place to make an agreement, but a place to apologize.

I tried to protect myself til the end. There is no reason to be attacked indiscriminately by unaware people, and Company B and C apologize for making mistakes so that there is no misunderstanding. This is an on-the-spot request for an official apology that includes content about the promise not to do so. I will also be the last to express my position through this text.

I am an individual. I have lived with the professional ethics I think, and have lived by doing my best to what I have been given, no matter what I do. I'm living with mistakes, I'm a bad person for someone, and a good person for someone. It is the same for C. However, this time is not divisible by me personally. It was an action to recover from personality blasphemy and to protect the minimum dignity for me, who did my professional mission for what I was asked to do, and for my colleagues who had the same experience so far.

I will manage to overcome this wound and strive to return to the former place and live again. And he does not react or act on this incident. It's not for me, but for C who came out yesterday. Therefore, if you are a fan who thinks about C from the bottom of their heart, I would like you to stay without crossing any further lines. Such sentences do not hurt me in any way and do not have a positive effect on her in any way.

Finally, my hoaxes for personal disclosure and exciting public opinion may not be preventable, no matter what I say, as I expected to some extent just because of the magnitude of this. But now it's better to stop. I am also preparing for that part separately.

The text has become longer. From my point of view, I had no choice but to write this sentence. I personally deeply apologize to the people involved in Company B for creating a difficult job.

Lastly, I would like to ask those who have read this sentence. In the end, I ask you to stop the speculations and articles that remain as even greater damage and damage. Thank you very much.